Check & monitor · Bulk index checker
Bulk index checker that reports coverage across thousands of URLs
Checking index status one URL at a time does not scale past a tiny site. When you manage thousands of pages, you need to see the whole picture in one place, with the indexed, missing and de-indexed pages sorted out for you rather than discovered by accident weeks later.
Submit · monitor coverage · official methods only
Ready to check coverage
Paste a sitemap to sweep every URL for index status, then submit the missing ones through the official Google Indexing API and Bing IndexNow.
Coverage
indexed
Avg time to index
URLs submitted
Now eligible
Live, interactive · sample data · official methods only
Official Google Indexing API · Bing IndexNow · verified sitemaps · no spam, no PBNs
In short
A bulk index checker reports whether each URL in a large list is in Google's index, instead of you checking them one at a time. The accurate way to do this at scale is the Search Console URL Inspection API, which returns Google's own verdict per URL and is capped at 2,000 queries per day and 600 per minute per property. Scraping site: queries only ever returns estimates.
Last updated July 2026
Indexing is a bulk index checker that handles your entire URL set at once. Paste a list, point it at a sitemap, or sync your whole property, and it reports the index status of every page along with a plain-English reason for the gaps. Missing pages can be resubmitted through the official Google Indexing API and sitemaps, all white-hat, no spam, no PBNs. We never claim to force indexing, because Google makes that decision, but nothing in your catalog goes unchecked.
Official methods only
White hat · no spam, no PBNs
Why it works
What your team gets with bulk index checker
Built for scale
Check thousands of URLs from a list, a sitemap or your full property in a single run, with no manual typing.
Sorted by status
Indexed, not indexed and de-indexed pages are separated cleanly, so you see exactly where attention is needed.
Resubmit the gaps
Missing pages can be pushed back to Google and Bing through official channels, with a reason attached to each one.
What it handles
Submitted, monitored and fixed, automatically
Indexing submits your URLs through the official Google Indexing API, Bing IndexNow and clean XML sitemaps, watches coverage across both engines, and flags any page that drops out with a plain-English reason so you can resubmit and get it back.
- Checks index status for thousands of URLs at once
- Imports from a list, a sitemap or your full property
- Sorts pages into indexed, missing and de-indexed
- Attaches a likely reason to every gap
- Resubmits missing pages via official methods
Not indexed yet
/blog/seo-guide-2026 is discovered but not indexed
thin content signal, queued for re-crawl via the Indexing API
Why Indexing
One place to submit, monitor and fix coverage
Not a black-hat indexer that risks your site, not a free checker that only tells you the bad news. Indexing unifies official submission and live coverage monitoring, the white-hat way, across Google and Bing.
Submits the official way
Bulk-submit through the Google Indexing API, Bing IndexNow and clean XML sitemaps. We speed discovery and re-crawl using methods the engines support, never spam, PBNs or black-hat tricks.
Monitors coverage live
You do not refresh a search bar one URL at a time. Indexing watches which pages are in Google and Bing, catches anything that drops out, and tracks time-to-index across your whole site.
Diagnoses and resubmits
Every non-indexed page comes with a plain-English reason, then auto-resubmits through the official API so it gets another shot. Google still decides, but nothing waits in the dark.
At a glance
How bulk index checking methods compare at scale
Where each method gets its answer from, and what you give up by using it.
| Method | Throughput | Data source | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| URL Inspection tool, by hand | Maybe 30 to 60 URLs an hour if you are quick. | Google's index. Authoritative. | Does not scale. A 5,000-URL catalog is weeks of clicking, and it is stale before you finish. |
| URL Inspection API | 2,000 queries per day, 600 per minute, per property. | Google's index. Same verdict as the tool. | The daily quota is a hard ceiling, so large sites have to prioritise which URLs are worth a query today. |
| Page indexing report export | Whole property in one export. | Google's index, but sampled per issue. | Gives you totals and example URLs, not a verdict on each specific URL in your list. |
| site: query scraping | As many as you can fire before Google blocks you. | Search results. An estimate. | Google says site: is an estimate, not a count. Numbers move between refreshes and miss indexed pages. |
| Server log analysis | Whole site, continuously. | Your server. Not Google. | Shows what Googlebot crawled, which is a different question from what Google indexed. |
| Sitemap coverage in Search Console | Whole sitemap. | Google's index, aggregated. | An indexed count per sitemap, so you know how many are missing but not which ones. |
Bulk index checking is a quota problem, not a speed problem
Tools advertise throughput, hundreds of URLs a second, as though checking the index were a race. It is not. Any check that returns Google's actual verdict goes through the Search Console URL Inspection API, and that API allows 2,000 queries per day and 600 per minute per property. No amount of engineering moves that number. A tool checking faster than that is either scraping search results, which returns estimates, or it is checking something other than the index.
Once you accept the ceiling, the design question changes. It is no longer "how fast can we check everything" but "which URLs are worth a query today". A 40,000-URL site cannot get an authoritative status on every page every day, and it does not need one. Your money pages, your newest publishes and anything that recently changed status are worth daily checks. A five-year-old archive page that has been indexed since 2021 is worth a monthly look.
- URL Inspection API: 2,000 queries per day, 600 per minute, per property.
- Split large sites across properties and the daily budget multiplies.
- Prioritise by value and volatility, not by alphabetical order.
- Re-check anything that just changed status, because flapping is a signal.
- Sitemap and page indexing totals give cheap whole-site sanity checks between deep runs.
Crawled is not indexed, and a bulk checker should say which
The most common failure in a bulk report is a binary column: indexed, yes or no. It is technically correct and practically useless, because "no" covers at least four situations that need completely different responses. A page Google has not crawled yet needs discovery help. A page Google crawled and declined needs to be rewritten or consolidated. A page with an accidental noindex needs a one-line fix. A page that redirects is not a problem at all.
That is why the reason matters more than the status at scale. When 800 URLs come back not indexed, you do not have 800 problems. You usually have three or four: a template producing near-duplicates, a faceted navigation pattern spraying thin URLs, a migration that orphaned a section, a stray directive nobody noticed. Group by cause and the report stops being a wall and starts being a short list of decisions.
What to do with the list once you have it
Take the accidents first, because they are free. Any URL excluded by a noindex tag you did not intend, blocked in robots.txt, or pointing its canonical somewhere odd is a page you are excluding yourself. These fixes take minutes and often clear a large block of the report in one change. Worth knowing while you are in there: robots.txt blocks crawling, not indexing, so Google can still index a disallowed URL and show it without a snippet. Google also dropped support for noindex inside robots.txt back in September 2019, so if you inherited a file that relies on it, it has been doing nothing for years.
Next take discovery. Pages sitting in "discovered, currently not indexed" have been queued, not judged, and internal links from pages Googlebot already visits often are the cheapest accelerant available. Trim dead and duplicate URLs out of the sitemap so the crawl budget concentrates. Submit the ones that matter through official channels and ping IndexNow for Bing.
Leave the quality bucket for last, and be honest about it. Pages in "crawled, currently not indexed" have already been read and turned down, so resubmitting them unchanged is theatre. Either make them substantially better and more distinct, fold them into a stronger page, or accept that they are not going to be indexed and stop spending crawl budget on them. We report what we find and resubmit through official channels only. Google still makes the call, and any tool that tells you otherwise is describing something you would not want done to your domain.
Good questions
Questions about bulk index checker
Explore more
More ways teams get every page indexed
Stop guessing. Get every page indexed and keep it that way.
Bulk-submit your URLs through the official Google and Bing channels, monitor coverage, and resubmit anything that drops out, automatically. White hat only, so we speed discovery without ever guaranteeing what Google chooses to index.
Google Indexing API · Bing IndexNow · sitemaps · coverage monitoring · official methods only