Compare · URLMonitor

URLMonitor alternative that submits and explains every missing URL now that URL Monitor is Cromojo

URLMonitor and Indexing get compared because both watch your sitemap and both will tell you when a page falls out of Google. That is where the overlap stops, and the difference matters more than the shared surface suggests.

or see the comparison ↓

Submit · monitor coverage · official methods only

Try

Indexed pages, week by week

Coverage report

78%

Coverage, up from 64%

41 min

Avg time to index

Submitted through official channels Left to crawl on its own

Indexed

What a check returns

Noindex Blocked in robots.txt Canonical elsewhere Ready to submit

Every URL gets a plain-English reason when a search engine will not index it, and the rest go out through the official channels.

Paste your sitemap and we count every URL it lists, then check a sample of your pages before we submit through the official Google Indexing API and Bing IndexNow.

We could not check that one

Crawlable

checked

Submitting via

URL What a crawler sees

Ready to submit

Need a fix first

We fetch the address you paste and read what a crawler sees · nothing is submitted to a search engine from this check

Index status itself comes from Search Console, which you connect on a plan · official Google Indexing API · Bing IndexNow · verified sitemaps · no spam, no PBNs

URLMonitor is a generalist. It scans everything on your sitemap once a day and reports on uptime, page speed, Core Web Vitals pulled from CrUX, security headers, DNS, broken links, accessibility and screenshots, with Google Analytics, Search Console and backlink monitoring on the top plan. Indexing problems sit in that list as one signal among a dozen. That breadth is genuinely useful and it is the reason to pick URLMonitor.

Indexing does one job. It pushes URLs into Google and Bing through official channels, watches whether they actually landed, and when one does not it tells you which of the two very different causes is responsible: Google never crawled the page, or Google crawled it and decided against it. Those need opposite fixes, and a monitor that reports the symptom leaves you to guess.

In short

Two products answer to the name. The indexing tool at urlmonitor.com is now Cromojo, which bundles Google and Bing indexing into an analytics suite at $19 to $299 a month. urlmonitor.ai is a separate daily site-health monitor that submits nothing. Indexing sells only the indexing job, through the official Google Indexing API and Bing IndexNow, with a plain-English reason for every URL that stays out.

URLMonitor watches whole-site health daily from your sitemap and flags indexing problems among many other signals. Indexing is the specialist that submits URLs to Google and Bing through official channels, proves what landed, and explains every page that did not.

Side by side

URLMonitor vs Indexing, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters	Indexing	URLMonitor
Core job	Submit URLs, confirm they were indexed, diagnose the ones that were not	Monitor whole-site health daily and alert you when something breaks
Submits URLs to search engines	Yes, via the Google Indexing API, Bing IndexNow and XML sitemaps	urlmonitor.ai: no, submission is not mentioned on its site. The older URL Monitor at urlmonitor.com, now Cromojo, does submit to Google and Bing (both checked September 2026)
Search engines covered	Google and Bing, plus Yandex, Seznam and Naver through the same IndexNow call	Cromojo submits to Google and Bing and offers IndexNow from its Starter tier up, but not on its free tier. urlmonitor.ai reports Google signals only
Why a page is not indexed	Plain-English reason per URL, separating never-crawled from crawled-and-declined	Flags indexing problems as an alert category
Beyond indexing	Nothing. We do not do uptime, Core Web Vitals, accessibility or Business Profile	Uptime, performance, CrUX, security headers, DNS, broken links, accessibility, screenshots, GBP, GA and backlinks
How it connects	Verified Search Console property plus a service account with Owner rights	Public sitemap.xml only. No plugin, no code, no install
Published scale	Sized by URLs submitted and monitored per month, up to six figures on higher plans	Cromojo: 1 to 50 sites and 25 to 2,400 URL submissions a day by tier. urlmonitor.ai: 3 websites and 3,000 pages daily on every published tier
Best suited for	Teams whose specific problem is pages not reaching the index	Owners of a few small sites who want one dashboard for overall site health

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick Indexing

One place to submit, monitor and fix coverage, the white-hat way

An alert is not a fix

Knowing a page dropped out of Google is the start of the work, not the end of it. Indexing resubmits through official channels and tells you which failure you are actually looking at.

Bing counts too

One IndexNow call reaches Bing, Yandex, Seznam and Naver, and Bing's index is what Microsoft Copilot draws on. URLMonitor does not mention Bing anywhere on its site.

Depth over breadth, deliberately

We do not monitor uptime or Core Web Vitals and will not pretend to. If whole-site health is your question, URLMonitor answers more of it than we do.

What Cromojo costs, tier by tier, read from its pricing page

This is the number the old URL Monitor buyers came for, and the rename changed its shape. Cromojo now sells three modules and its own FAQ states that Analytics, Indexing and Monitoring are priced separately, so you pick the ones you need and each scales on its own. That means the headline price applies per module, not to the platform. Indexing and Monitoring scale by the number of sites; Analytics scales by monthly pageviews and carries an overage rate above the included allowance.

The Indexing module is the part that replaces what URL Monitor used to do, and its ladder is below. Annual billing takes roughly 20 percent off every tier. There is a permanently free tier with one site, and separately a 14 day trial of the Pro plan.

Cromojo Indexing tier	Monthly, and annual	Sites	URL submissions a day	Google service accounts	Sitemap check
Free	$0	1	25	1	Every 24h
Starter	$19, or $16 annually	1	300	1	Every 24h
Pro	$49, or $39 annually	5	600	3	Every 12h
Business	$129, or $99 annually	20	1,200	6	Every 6h
Agency	$299, or $239 annually	50	2,400	10	Every 6h

Read from cromojo.com/pricing in September 2026. Bing indexing, IndexNow submissions, CSV export and weekly digests start at Starter. Auto-resubmit of dropped pages starts at Pro. API access, workspace branding and per-site team access start at Business.

What the higher Cromojo tiers are actually selling you

Put two rows of that table side by side. Daily URL submissions run 25, 300, 600, 1,200 and 2,400. Google service accounts run 1, 1, 3, 6 and 10. Divide one by the other and most tiers land on almost exactly 200 submissions per service account.

That is not a coincidence. Google documents the default publish quota for the Indexing API at 200 requests a day per project, and a service account belongs to a project. So climbing the ladder does not buy faster indexing from Google. It buys more of Google own quota, stacked across more projects. That is a perfectly legitimate way to build the product, and it is worth understanding before you pay four times as much expecting four times the speed on a single site.

The same ceiling applies to everyone here, including us. Google retired the public Add URL form and tied submission to verified ownership, Request Indexing in Search Console runs at roughly 10 to 12 URLs a day per property, and the Indexing API default sits at 200 a day per project. Nobody in this category sells throughput Google does not already meter. What separates the tools is what happens to the pages the meter leaves behind, which is where the reason for every miss matters more than the cap.

One figure Cromojo does not publish: the matrix caps daily submissions and sets sitemap check frequency per tier, but it does not state a ceiling on how many URLs it will track the index status of. If you are sizing a plan around a large catalog, get that number in writing before you commit.

What URLMonitor actually does, from its own site

URLMonitor works entirely from your public sitemap.xml. There is nothing to install, no plugin and no code on the page, which is a clean design decision and means it works on any platform without touching your stack. Once it has the sitemap it scans those pages daily and reports on uptime, performance, Core Web Vitals pulled from the CrUX dataset, security headers and DNS. Higher plans add screenshot monitoring, Google Business Profile monitoring, broken link checks and accessibility checks, and the top plan adds Google Analytics, Search Console and backlink monitoring.

The framing on its homepage is about finding out before your customers do: the site goes down at 2am, or a critical page breaks, or performance degrades and conversions quietly drop. Indexing problems appear in that list as one of the categories it watches, alongside botched domain migrations, DNS issues, downtime and security headers. That is an accurate description of what it is, and it is a real product category with real value.

The scale is worth reading carefully, because it is identical across every published tier: three websites and three thousand pages a day. That is a sensible ceiling for a local service business, a blog or a small ecommerce store, and it is a hard stop for anyone running a catalogue in the tens of thousands. If your indexing problem is a large site, the plan shape rules it out before the feature list does.

The gap that matters for this comparison is what is absent. We read the whole of urlmonitor.ai in August 2026 and the words Bing, IndexNow, Indexing API, crawl and submit do not appear on it once. GSC appears three times, as a plan feature label. Nothing on the site claims URLMonitor submits anything anywhere, and to be fair to them, nothing on the site claims otherwise. It is a monitor. The confusion only arises because buyers searching for an indexing tool land on it.

Why monitoring alone leaves the expensive half of the job undone

Every index monitor produces the same artefact: a list of URLs that are not in the index. That list is worth having. The trouble is that it looks like an answer when it is really a question, because two completely different failures produce identical rows on it.

The first failure is discovery. Google has never fetched the page. It is not linked from anywhere Google crawls often, it is buried nine clicks deep, it is missing from the sitemap, or the site is new and Google has not got round to it. Google is direct about the timescale here, stating that "it can take a few weeks for Google to notice a new site". Submission is the correct treatment and it works, because you are supplying the one thing that was missing.

The second failure is judgement. Google fetched the page, read it, and chose not to index it. In Search Console this appears as "Crawled - currently not indexed", and it is the status that quietly burns the most budget in this category. Resubmitting that URL changes nothing, because the input Google evaluated has not changed. A tool whose only move is to resubmit will loop on it forever, reporting activity while the page stays out.

So the sequence that actually resolves a coverage problem is diagnose, fix, then submit. A monitor gives you step zero. It cannot tell you which of the two buckets a URL belongs in, so it cannot tell you whether to submit it or rewrite it. That is not a criticism of URLMonitor specifically, it is the ceiling on the whole monitoring category, and it is the reason we built the reason-per-URL output rather than a prettier alert.

The submission channels URLMonitor does not touch

There are exactly three legitimate ways to push a URL at a search engine, and all of them are gated on proving you own the domain. Google retired the public Add URL form years ago, which is why no honest service can submit URLs on a domain you do not control. That single fact disqualifies most of the products advertising themselves in this space.

The first channel is the XML sitemap, which is unglamorous and still the backbone. It is how Google and Bing both learn the shape of your site, and it is the mechanism URLMonitor itself depends on to know which pages to scan. Keeping it clean, current and free of URLs that redirect or 404 does more for a mid-sized site than any submission API.

The second is the Google Indexing API. Calls go to https://indexing.googleapis.com/v3/urlNotifications:publish, must use application/json as the Content-Type header, and carry one of exactly two notification types, URL_UPDATED or URL_DELETED. The quota is documented as a default of 200 publish requests per day per project, with 380 requests per minute per project across all endpoints. Both are project-level limits rather than per-site limits, which is worth knowing before you read anyone's per-plan daily cap as a personal allowance. Worth saying plainly: Google documents this API primarily for JobPosting and BroadcastEvent content, and the whole category including us uses it more broadly than that.

The third is IndexNow, which is a single HTTP call. You host a key file at your domain root, post your URLs, and one submission propagates to Bing, Yandex, Seznam and Naver. It accepts up to 10,000 URLs per request and the response codes are unambiguous: 200 accepted, 202 accepted and pending, 400 invalid format, 403 key not valid, 422 a URL and key mismatch, 429 too many requests. Google still does not consume IndexNow as of 2026, so the Google path and the IndexNow path are genuinely separate and a serious setup runs both.

Where URLMonitor is the better buy

If the honest description of your problem is "I do not know whether my site is healthy", URLMonitor is a better purchase than we are and you should stop comparing here. Uptime, Core Web Vitals, security headers, broken links and accessibility in one daily scan is a lot of ground covered by one subscription, and none of it is ground we cover at all.

That case is common and often more urgent than an indexing problem. A page returning a 500 error is an indexing problem and an uptime problem and a revenue problem simultaneously, and it is the uptime alert that gets you there fastest. Google confirms the mechanism: 5xx and 429 responses "prompt Google's crawlers to temporarily slow down with crawling", any content returned from a URL with a 5xx status is ignored, and the crawl-rate reduction is proportionate to how many of your URLs are erroring. Server health and crawl health are the same conversation, and a monitor sits closer to the cause than we do.

Site speed works the same way on large sites. Google states that when a site "responds consistently and its response times (including latency and Time-to-First Byte) remain stable or improve, the limit goes up", and that when a site slows down or returns server errors or rate-limiting signals, "the limit goes down". If you are running a large catalogue and your crawl coverage is poor, the fix may well be in the performance data URLMonitor collects rather than in any submission tool.

The two products are not really substitutes, which is the most useful thing we can tell you. A monitor watches for the symptom. A submission and diagnosis tool works the case. Teams running large sites usually end up with both, and if you only have budget for one, buy the one that matches the problem you can actually name today.

Two products called URL Monitor, and what each one costs

Searches for a URLMonitor alternative land on two unrelated products, and most comparison pages quietly pick one. The one described above is urlmonitor.ai, a site-health monitor. The other is the older URL Monitor at urlmonitor.com, an indexing automation tool sold widely through AppSumo, which has rebranded as Cromojo. urlmonitor.com now redirects to cromojo.com, and Cromojo published its own announcement, "URL Monitor is now Cromojo". If you bought the indexing product, that is the one you are replacing.

urlmonitor.ai publishes three plans, Starter, Creator and Pro, on an early-adopter ladder that rises as signups grow: the entry tier is $9 for the first twenty-five users, then $12, $15 and $19 at later milestones, with Creator running $19 to $49 and Pro $39 to $99. When we checked again in September 2026 its plan buttons were still marked Coming Soon. It offers a full refund in the first thirty days, no questions asked.

Cromojo is live and has gone broader rather than deeper. It now leads with revenue analytics, attributing sales from Stripe and Shopify to pages and keywords, with Google and Bing indexing, a weekly indexing digest, auto-resubmission of dropped pages, uptime and page monitoring included on every plan. Monthly prices read from cromojo.com in September 2026: Starter $19 for 1 site, Pro $49 for 5, Business $129 for 20 and Agency $299 for 50, or $16, $39, $99 and $239 billed annually, each with a 7-day trial. API access starts at Business.

Indexing plans start at $29 a month, billed annually, sized by the number of URLs you submit and monitor rather than by site count. Against Cromojo the honest trade is scope. Cromojo bundles indexing into an analytics suite priced by sites and traffic. Indexing sells only the indexing job, with a plain-English reason for every URL that stays out. If you want analytics anyway, the bundle is good value. If coverage is the specific problem, you would be paying for dashboards you will not open.

How to decide in an afternoon

Start with a count rather than a shortlist. Take your full URL list and establish how many are genuinely in the index today. People are routinely wrong about this in both directions, and the number converts a vague worry into a specific list you can act on. If almost everything is indexed, your problem is rankings and neither of these tools is the purchase.

Next, split the problem URLs into never-crawled and crawled-then-declined. This is the single decision that determines which category you are shopping in. If most of your missing pages have never been fetched, you have a discovery problem and a submission tool will move the number. If most of them were crawled and passed over, you have a content or duplication or canonical problem, and the honest answer is that you should spend the money on fixing pages rather than on any subscription in this niche.

Then ask what else is on your plate. If you are also unsure whether the site is up, fast and free of broken links, the breadth argument for URLMonitor is strong and buying one dashboard beats buying three. If the site is well-instrumented already and coverage is the specific hole, breadth is just surface area you will not look at.

Finally, check the ceilings against your actual numbers before anything else. URLMonitor publishes three websites and three thousand pages daily on every tier it lists, so a large catalogue does not fit no matter which plan you choose. Match that against your real URL count and your real publishing rate, and in most cases the decision has already made itself.

Good questions

URLMonitor vs Indexing, answered

It depends which half of the job you need. If you want the indexing part done properly, with official submission to Google and Bing, coverage tracking on both, and a reason for every page that stays missing, Indexing is the closest match. If you wanted URLMonitor mainly for uptime, Core Web Vitals and broken links, we are not a replacement at all and a general site-health monitor is the right category.

Not according to its own website. We read urlmonitor.ai in August 2026 and it contains no mention of submission, IndexNow, the Google Indexing API or connecting a Search Console property for submission. It is a monitoring product that scans the pages in your public sitemap daily and flags problems, including indexing problems, as alerts. Acting on those alerts is left to you.

The indexing tool at urlmonitor.com is. That domain now redirects to cromojo.com, and Cromojo announced the change itself. Cromojo sells plans from $19 to $299 a month that bundle Google and Bing indexing with revenue analytics and uptime monitoring. The site-health monitor at urlmonitor.ai is a separate company and was still showing Coming Soon plan buttons in September 2026.

If you used URL Monitor purely to get pages into Google and Bing and do not want an analytics suite, pick a tool that sells only that job. Indexing submits through the official Google Indexing API, Bing IndexNow and XML sitemaps on properties you verify, monitors coverage, and explains every URL that stays out. Plans start at $29 a month, billed annually.

Its published plans all list three websites and three thousand pages daily, on the entry, middle and top tiers alike. The tiers differ by feature depth rather than volume, adding screenshots, Business Profile, broken links and accessibility, then Analytics, Search Console and backlink monitoring at the top. If you run a catalogue larger than a few thousand URLs, that ceiling is the constraint to check first.

One, if you can name the problem. A monitor tells you a page left the index; a submission tool gets pages in and explains the ones that stay out. If your coverage is stable and you mainly worry about breakages, buy the monitor. If pages regularly fail to get indexed in the first place, monitoring will keep describing the problem without moving it. Large teams usually run both.

Because submission is gated on verified ownership and monitoring is not. URLMonitor reads your public sitemap from outside, which needs no permission at all. Submitting through the Google Indexing API requires authenticating as a service account with Owner-level access on the property, and no lesser permission works. That is Google's requirement rather than the vendor's, and you can revoke the access yourself in Search Console at any time.

Keep reading

IndexCheckr vs URL Monitor (Cromojo) Pricing Compared Checks at $0.0013 each with no subscription, or a $19 to $299 monthly ladder that also submits. Cost at three volumes, the rebrand, and which to buy.

More comparisons

See how Indexing compares

vs Instant Link Indexer

Instant Link Indexer alternative

Eight daily-volume plans from $13.77, a 70 to 80 percent indexing guarantee its sister service says nobody can give, and no HTTPS.

vs Elite Link Indexer

Elite Link Indexer alternative

The lowest price per submitted link we have found, no refunds, and a 30-day wait before you know whether it worked.

vs Indexceptional

Indexceptional alternative

Same price ladder as a refunding indexer, without the refund. Work out the cost per indexed link first.

vs Indexification

Indexification alternative

Fourteen years old, 50,000 links a day, and no price on the public site. Read the guarantee before you register.

vs IndexBolt

IndexBolt alternative

It sells a crawl request, not an indexed link. Price the difference before you buy credits.

vs Sinbyte

Sinbyte alternative

The cheapest submission in the category, billed whether the link indexes or not.

vs Backlinks Indexer

Backlinks Indexer alternative

A monthly quota of submissions that renews whether your links index or not.

vs Links Indexer

Links Indexer alternative

Very cheap pings with no per-link proof of indexing, and campaign records deleted a week after they finish.

vs Colinkri

Colinkri alternative

Monthly crawl credits that expire every cycle, no refunds, and no per-link proof that anything was indexed.

vs Giga Indexer

Giga Indexer alternative

Credit packs from $29 for 60 URLs, two different price lists on one site, and no refund terms you can actually read.

vs GSC Wizard

GSC Wizard alternative

A Search Console analytics suite whose indexing monitor tells you a page dropped, and leaves getting it back to you.

vs IndexProbe

IndexProbe alternative

Bulk URL inspection from $49 a month that tells you which pages Google dropped, and stops there.

vs Linkdexing

Linkdexing alternative

Five cents a link whether it indexes or not, and two weeks before you know.

vs IndexMeNow

IndexMeNow alternative

Official channels on sites you own, with a reason for every page that stays missing.

vs Indexly

Indexly alternative

Priced by URLs indexed, not by prompts tracked.

vs IndexCheckr

IndexCheckr alternative

Check and submit in one place, through official APIs.

vs IndexGuru

IndexGuru alternative

Going from $9 to $149 buys more domains, not more speed on any one site.

vs IndexChex

IndexChex alternative

A check, a submission and a recheck are three credits, and every one of them is final.

vs Omega Indexer

Omega Indexer alternative

Official channels on sites you own, with a reason for every page that stays missing.

vs Indexing Insight

Indexing Insight alternative

A serious monitoring tool that tells you which pages fell out of Google. It will not put them back, and it says so itself.

vs Rapid Indexer

Rapid Indexer alternative

Two cents a URL, no refund when Google says no, and a vendor that tells you itself to keep it away from your money site.

vs Rapid URL Indexer

Rapid URL Indexer alternative

Batch reporting ends at 14 days. Coverage is a permanent job.

vs Rapid Index Checker

Rapid Index Checker alternative

Checking is the diagnosis, not the cure.

vs SpeedyIndex

SpeedyIndex alternative

Official submission on domains you own, with proof of what actually got indexed.

vs INDEXED.pro

Indexed.pro alternative

Euro-priced, Google only, and its daily caps are Google's quota rather than its own.

vs IndexRusher

IndexRusher alternative

Same daily Google ceiling, a very different answer to what happens when a page still will not index.

vs Rank Math Instant Indexing

Rank Math Instant Indexing alternative

The plugin confirms Google received a request. It never tells you whether the page got indexed.

vs One Hour Indexing

One Hour Indexing alternative

Their own published tests say one hour indexes 12 to 23 percent. Here is what to do with the rest.

Compare every indexing tool See every use case

Get every page indexed with Indexing

One place to bulk-submit your URLs through the official Google and Bing channels, monitor coverage, and resubmit anything that drops out. White hat only, so we speed discovery without ever guaranteeing what Google chooses to index.

See pricing

Google Indexing API · Bing IndexNow · sitemaps · coverage monitoring · official methods only